Re: [DISCUSS] Making system calls more portable.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/07/2007 10:07 AM, Amit Choudhary wrote:

However, people may say that, implementing custom system calls is not
advocated by linux. And I think it is not advocated precisely because
of this reason that they are not portable.

True I guess. But do you want to live in a software environment where as a matter of course every distribution out there puts its "value-add" in custom system calls and creating a $DISTRIBUTION-only userspace? After all, if nothing uses their shiny new custom syscall, they might as well not add it. This would fragment Linux quite horribly and IMO cases where this happens should be _dis_ couraged, not encouraged by making it less problematic to survive the resulting mess.

Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux