On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 10:45:05PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Marcus Meissner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > You're right. I'm inclined to just revert it, modulo some comments
> > > from others. Marcus?
> >
> > After thinking about this, yes.
> >
> > I would rather have a working range used here (perhaps like Hugh
> > suggested), but feel free to revert the original patch if you are not
> > confident with it.
>
> i'm wondering why you had to try to reinvent the wheel, instead of
> picking up exec-shield's remaining bits of randomization implementation
> from Fedora, which was tested for a long time and achieves PIE
> randomization and more?
Because it is i386 only last time I checked.
And it requires relaying out the heap (which you did only for i386), with
architecture specific code, which I was too afraid to touch.
Ciao, Marcus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
