On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:37 -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> >
> > There is already a dynamic tick (NO_HZ) system in the -mm tree .. Given
> > that this implementation seems unnecessary. Why do you need another
> > different system to do this?
> >
>
> We don't. This was written before the dynamic tick code, and now they
> need to be merged. Until then, they can safely coexist.
So really this can't go upstream till that merge happens. What's
preventing you from just directly using NO_HZ without changes?
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
