H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
BTW, yesterday my 2.4 patches were not published, but I noticed that
they were not even signed not bziped on hera. At first I simply thought
it was related, but right now I have a doubt. Maybe the automatic
script
has been temporarily been disabled on hera too ?
The script that deals with the uploads also deals with the packaging -
so yes the problem is related.
and with the finger_banner and version info on www.kernel.org page?
Yes, they're all connected.
The load on *both* machines were up above the 300s yesterday, probably
due to the release of a new Knoppix DVD.
The most fundamental problem seems to be that I can't tell currnt Linux
kernels that the dcache/icache is precious, and that it's way too eager
to dump dcache and icache in favour of data blocks. If I could do that,
this problem would be much, much smaller.
Have you messed around with /proc/sys/vm/vfs_cache_pressure?
Unfortunately that affects all three of: dcache, icache, and mbcache.
Maybe we could split that sysctl in two (Andrew?), so that one sysctl
affects dcache/icache and another affects mbcache.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]