Re: 2.6.20-rc3 regression? hdparm shows 1/2...1/3 the throughput

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tim Schmielau wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
> 
>> Did anybody else notice this?  The result of "hdparm -t" under 2.6.20-rc
>> seems to be less than half of what you get on 2.6.19.  However, disk I/O
>> did *not* get slower according to bonnie++.
> 
> yes. See
>   http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/2/75
> for the solution.
> 
> Tim

Thanks. I should have remembered that.

# hdparm -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing cached reads:   10864 MB in  2.00 seconds = 5440.10 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:   58 MB in  3.06 seconds =  18.94 MB/sec
# cat /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
noop anticipatory deadline [cfq]
# echo anticipatory > /sys/block/hda/queue/scheduler
# hdparm -tT /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing cached reads:   10680 MB in  2.00 seconds = 5347.20 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  148 MB in  3.02 seconds =  49.03 MB/sec

-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ---= --==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux