Re: [patch] paravirt: isolate module ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 18:07 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > 
> > I would suggest a slightly different carving.  For one, no TLB flushes.  
> > If you can't modify PTEs, why do you need to have TLB flushes?  And I 
> > would allow CR0 read / write for code which saves and restores FPU state 
> 
> no that is abstracted away by kernel_fpu_begin/end. Modules have no
> business doing that themselves

Sure, but it'll take some time to fix the raid modules (which are the
ones which abuse this).

I'm testing a patch now, I'll send the clts removal patch on top of that
once it's done.

Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux