Re: Linux 2.6.16.37

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>]

On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 05:05:55PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <20061228135308.GB20714@stusta.de>
> 
> On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:53:08 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> > Changes since 2.6.16.36:
> > ...
> 
> If you're not going to merge the critical x86 fixes I sent,
> I won't bother sending anything more.

Sorry, they didn't went in before 2.6.16.37-rc1, and except for 
releasing 2.6.16.37-rc1 unchanged as 2.6.16.37 I didn't work on 2.6.16 
during christmas and new year.

I've now applied all three patches.

There's already a CVE number for
"i386: save/restore eflags in context switch".

Are there also CVE numbers for the equivalent x86_64 patch and
"x86_64: fix ia32 syscall count"?

Thanks for your patches
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/