Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()

Andrew Morton a écrit :

There's a lot of sloppiness in there.  Do these two patches fix things up?


Still no luck :-(
You managed to propagate the return value up to the
highest level (sync()), but as it's "void sync()" the return
value is dropped.
When msync() comes after it finds nothing in the mapping
flags.

Cheers.

--
Guillaume

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
  - From: Guillaume Chazarain <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
  - From: Guillaume Chazarain <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Alternative msync() fix for 2.6.18?
Next by Date: Re: using splice/vmsplice to improve file receive performance
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Handle error in sync_sb_inodes()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]