Ingo Molnar a écrit :
* Pierre Peiffer <[email protected]> wrote:
Ingo Molnar a écrit :
looks good to me in principle. The size of the patch is scary - is there
really no simpler way?
Humf, in fact, for the 64-bit part, I've followed the rule of the
existing 64-bit code in futex.c, which consists of duplicating all the
functions which can not be kept common, and add a suffix 64 to all
duplicated functions. Perhaps I missed something ?
i dont think you missed anything - but some consolidation here would be
nice. Only if possible of course :-)
Ok ;-)
So, you are not only speaking about "my" part of duplicated code, right ?
But, just for information, what is the sys_futex64 for, exactly ? Is there a
plan to have in the future a 64-bit PID ? Because for now, 32-bits futex is
enough, so... ?
Otherwise, I don't have a "clean" way to avoid this duplication.... :-/
--
Pierre Peiffer
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
