Re: [PATCH 3/2] fix flush_workqueue() vs CPU_DEAD race

[Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 07:34:59PM +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> 
> > handle-cpu_lock_acquire-and-cpu_lock_release-in-workqueue_cpu_callback.patch
> 
> Again, this one ensures that workqueue_mutex is taken/released on
> CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE/CPU_LOCK_RELEASE events in the cpuhotplug callback
> function. So this one is required, unless it conflicts with what Oleg
> has posted. Will check that out tonite.

We would still be needing this patch as it's complementing what Oleg has
posted.

Thanks and Regards
gautham.
-- 
Gautham R Shenoy
Linux Technology Center
IBM India.
"Freedom comes with a price tag of responsibility, which is still a bargain,
because Freedom is priceless!"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/