Jens Axboe wrote:
I did have to massage the second patch to get it to apply cleanly after the first patch. You may want to regenerate it against -rc3.Hmm odd, I thought I did. Will double check.
Ahh.. I get it now. I tried to apply the second patch *on top* of the first patch, whereas it was supposed to be a full replacement instead. Cheers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- References:
- 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19 and up to 2.6.20-rc2 Ethernet problems x86_64
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19 and up to 2.6.20-rc2 Ethernet problems x86_64
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
- Index(es):
 |