On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 21:01 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:57:05 +1100
>
> > I like being able to have a simple way (ie. tar /proc/device-tree) to
> > tell user to send me their DT and have in the end an exact binary
> > representation so I can actually dig for problems, like a wrong phandle
> > in an interrupt-map or stuff like that...
>
> "prtconf -pv" is what I'd ask the user to do on Sparc, or something
> similar.
>
> In over 10 years of the sparc port there's never been a situation
> where "prtconf -pv" or similar did not get me the information I
> needed. :-)
>
> "prtconf" walks the device tree raw using /dev/openprom and
> pretty prints it like I assume your ppc "lsprop" thing does.
Probably. The question now is that if we want to somewhat converge, what
to do... either change sparc habits or change powerpc habits :-) I'll
let that fight happen between you and paulus and watch while having a
beer at LCA though :-)
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
