Re: [BUG 2.6.20-rc2-mm1] init segfaults when CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY=y

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 11:45:09AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 23:04 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The following messages keeps popping up when CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY=y:
> > 
> > init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8118c110 rip ffffffff8118c110 rsp 00007fff9a9d14d8 error 15
> > init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8118c110 rip ffffffff8118c110 rsp 00007fff9a9d14d8 error 15
> > init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8118c110 rip ffffffff8118c110 rsp 00007fff9a9d14d8 error 15
> > init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8118c110 rip ffffffff8118c110 rsp 00007fff9a9d14d8 error 15
> > init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8118c110 rip ffffffff8118c110 rsp 00007fff9a9d14d8 error 15
> > init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8118c110 rip ffffffff8118c110 rsp 00007fff9a9d14d8 error 15
> > init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8118c110 rip ffffffff8118c110 rsp 00007fff9a9d14d8 error 15
> > init[1]: segfault at ffffffff8118c110 rip ffffffff8118c110 rsp 00007fff9a9d14d8 error 15
> > 
> 
> 
> Does this seem like an appropriate solution? This just reconstitutes
> Ingo's patch by removing the unlikely calls that got added recently. 
> 
> Maybe a comment into vsyscall.c that says to stay away from all macro's
> and possible debug code that could be added might be helpful ?
> 
> Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>

Thanks, it worked!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux