> Therefore, FUSE probably could have been fixed by judicious use
> of copy_{to,from}_user_page() calls instead of adding this new
> ad-hoc flush_anon_page() thing.
Probably, but I don't think either interface is perfect.
copy_*_user_page() will double flush the user mapping
(get_user_pages() already does a flush_dcache_page()). Actually
nothing except ptrace uses the copy_*_user_page() interface even
though there are many uses of get_user_pages().
What I think get_user_pages() really needs is a single operation that
- flushes the virtual address view
- flushes the kernel view
regardles whether the page is anonymous or file backed.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: fuse, get_user_pages, flush_anon_page, aliasing caches and all that again
- Re: fuse, get_user_pages, flush_anon_page, aliasing caches and all that again
- Re: fuse, get_user_pages, flush_anon_page, aliasing caches and all that again
- Re: fuse, get_user_pages, flush_anon_page, aliasing caches and all that again
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]