Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, David Brownell wrote:

> Phillip:  is this the final version, then?  It's missing
> a signed-off-by line, so I can't do anything appropriate.
> 
> Nico, your signoff here would be a Good Thing too if it
> meets your technical review.  (My only comment, ISTR, was
> that gpio_set_value macro should probably test for whether
> the value is a constant too, not just the gpio pin.)

I don't think so.  Expansion of GPIO_bit(x) is pretty simple even if x 
is not constant.  That probably makes it still less costly than a 
function call.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux