Linus Torvalds wrote:
[...] The patch is mostly a comment. The "real" meat of it is actually just a few lines.Can anybody get corruption with this thing applied? It goes on top of plain v2.6.20-rc2.
No corruption with the testcase here. Will check with rtorrent too later today but I suppose it will work just fine. Nice work! It has been interesting (and educating) to follow this bug-hunt :)
/Martin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
- From: Segher Boessenkool <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Ok, explained.. (was Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Ok, explained.. (was Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1: INFO: possible recursive locking detected in con_close
- Next by Date: Re: [take29 0/8] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
- Previous by thread: Re: Ok, explained.. (was Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one)
- Next by thread: Re: Ok, explained.. (was Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one)
- Index(es):
 |