Re: [-mm patch] ptrace: make {put,get}reg work again for gs and fs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 06:11:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:00:49 -0800
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > > This is a -mm1 kernel + your efl_offset fix + the attached patch.
> > > So the problem came from putreg still saving %gs to the stack where
> > > there's no slot for it, whereas getreg got things right.
> > >   
> > 
> > That patch looks good, but I think it is already effectively in Andrew's
> > queue, because I noticed some problems in there when I reviewed  the
> > convert-to-%fs patch.
> > 
> 
> The below is what I have queued for urgent mainlining to address these
> problems.
> 
> Is it sufficient?
> 
No, it's not. The patch below fixes the place where we get eflags, this
triggered the "BUG while gdb'ing" reports.
The one I sent was to fix a problem that only I reported, AFAIK: when
you use gdb/ptrace to modify %fs, the value gets written in the wrong
place (see gdb sessions). So, unless you have another patch fixing the
way putreg() writes %fs, the patch[1] I sent should also be queued for
mainline.

Regards,
Frederik

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/21/267
> 
> 
> 
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
> 
> The PDA patches introduced a bug in ptrace: it reads eflags from the wrong
> place on the target's stack, but writes it back to the correct place.  The
> result is a corrupted eflags, which is most visible when it turns interrupts
> off unexpectedly.
> 
> This patch fixes this by making the ptrace code a little less fragile.  It
> changes [gs]et_stack_long to take a straightforward byte offset into struct
> pt_regs, rather than requiring all callers to do a sizeof(struct pt_regs)
> offset adjustment.  This means that the eflag's offset (EFL_OFFSET) on the
> target stack can be simply computed with offsetof().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
> Cc: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
>  arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c |   21 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -puN arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c~ptrace-fix-efl_offset-value-according-to-i386-pda-changes arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c~ptrace-fix-efl_offset-value-according-to-i386-pda-changes
> +++ a/arch/i386/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
>  /*
>   * Offset of eflags on child stack..
>   */
> -#define EFL_OFFSET ((EFL-2)*4-sizeof(struct pt_regs))
> +#define EFL_OFFSET offsetof(struct pt_regs, eflags)
>  
>  static inline struct pt_regs *get_child_regs(struct task_struct *task)
>  {
> @@ -54,24 +54,24 @@ static inline struct pt_regs *get_child_
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * this routine will get a word off of the processes privileged stack. 
> - * the offset is how far from the base addr as stored in the TSS.  
> - * this routine assumes that all the privileged stacks are in our
> + * This routine will get a word off of the processes privileged stack.
> + * the offset is bytes into the pt_regs structure on the stack.
> + * This routine assumes that all the privileged stacks are in our
>   * data space.
>   */   
>  static inline int get_stack_long(struct task_struct *task, int offset)
>  {
>  	unsigned char *stack;
>  
> -	stack = (unsigned char *)task->thread.esp0;
> +	stack = (unsigned char *)task->thread.esp0 - sizeof(struct pt_regs);
>  	stack += offset;
>  	return (*((int *)stack));
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * this routine will put a word on the processes privileged stack. 
> - * the offset is how far from the base addr as stored in the TSS.  
> - * this routine assumes that all the privileged stacks are in our
> + * This routine will put a word on the processes privileged stack.
> + * the offset is bytes into the pt_regs structure on the stack.
> + * This routine assumes that all the privileged stacks are in our
>   * data space.
>   */
>  static inline int put_stack_long(struct task_struct *task, int offset,
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline int put_stack_long(struct 
>  {
>  	unsigned char * stack;
>  
> -	stack = (unsigned char *) task->thread.esp0;
> +	stack = (unsigned char *)task->thread.esp0 - sizeof(struct pt_regs);
>  	stack += offset;
>  	*(unsigned long *) stack = data;
>  	return 0;
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static int putreg(struct task_struct *ch
>  	}
>  	if (regno > ES*4)
>  		regno -= 1*4;
> -	put_stack_long(child, regno - sizeof(struct pt_regs), value);
> +	put_stack_long(child, regno, value);
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -137,7 +137,6 @@ static unsigned long getreg(struct task_
>  		default:
>  			if (regno > ES*4)
>  				regno -= 1*4;
> -			regno = regno - sizeof(struct pt_regs);
>  			retval &= get_stack_long(child, regno);
>  	}
>  	return retval;
> _
> 
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux