Re: [PATCH -mm 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: john stultz <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64
From: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:42:14 -0500
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>, Andi Kleen <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:13:19 EST." <20061220220945.15178.2669.sendpatchset@localhost>
References: <20061220220945.15178.2669.sendpatchset@localhost>
Sender: [email protected]

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:13:19 EST, john stultz said:
> Andrew, Andi,
> 
> Here is the same patchset from lastnight, re-diffed against -mm

This one does indeed apply, compile, and boot.

> Thanks to Valdis Kletnieks for pointing out that it didn't apply.

Not being a locking ninja or a PCI demigod, I figure I can at least contribute
testing and mostly-parseable bug reports. :)

Attachment: pgptzCuVee95h.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- [PATCH -mm 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64
  - From: john stultz <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
Next by Date: [PATCH] dumb typo in generic csum_ipv6_magic()
Previous by thread: [PATCH -mm 2/5][time][x86_64] hpet_address cleanup
Next by thread: Mutex debug lock failure [was Re: Bad gcc-4.1.0 leads to Power4 crashes... and power5 too, actually
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux