Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, David Brownell wrote:

> On Wednesday 20 December 2006 10:12 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Why not implement them as inline functions?
> 
> I just collected and forwarded the code from Philip...
> the better not to lose such stuff!  :)
> 
>  
> > Or non-inline functions, come to that.
> 
> In this case I think that'd be preferable; see what those macros
> expand to on pxa27x CPUs.

Only if the gpio argument is not constant please.  When it is constant 
this expands to a single word store.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
    • From: "pHilipp Zabel" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [patch/rfc 2.6.19-rc5] arch-neutral GPIO calls
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
    • From: David Brownell <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Patch "i386: Relocatable kernel support" causes instant reboot
• Next by Date: Re: [take28-resend_1->0 0/8] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 2.6.20-rc1 4/6] PXA GPIO wrappers
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]