Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:06:28 -0500
"Bob Picco" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sorry I was looking for AIM VII and/or reaim which are multiuser loads.
> The results (2.6.20-rc1-mm1) for EXTREME, SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP and
> SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP+your+patch are below. Note SPARSEMEM+VMEMMAP AIM VII
> wasn't benchmarked to higher load limit because of my time constraints. 
> The runs should be repeated more times.

Thank you.
> 
> Any difference between the three configurations looks insignificant and
> within benchmark noise.
> 
looks so ;)

Because I'm now exhausted by other works, I can't go ahead until the next year.
My concern is io-benchmark like iozone.

Andrew-san, please drop the patch set if anyone isn't interested in.
I'll retry with new benchmark result if necessary.

-Kame

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]
    • From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]
    • From: "Bob Picco" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 10/10] local_t : x86_64
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Relay CPU Hotplug support
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH][2.6.20-rc1-mm1] sparsemem vmem_map optimzed pfn_valid() [0/2]
• Next by thread: Software RAID1 (with non-identical discs) performance
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]