Frederik Deweerdt wrote: > It works too, thanks. BTW, I wondered if the "case GS:" in getreg() made > sense now? Sorry, what do you mean? It looks OK to me, but I'm not sure what you're referring to. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb
- From: "Andrew J. Barr" <[email protected]>
- Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- [-mm patch] ptrace: Fix EFL_OFFSET value according to i386 pda changes (was Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb)
- From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] ptrace: Fix EFL_OFFSET value according to i386 pda changes (was Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb)
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] ptrace: Fix EFL_OFFSET value according to i386 pda changes (was Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb)
- From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>
- BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb
- Prev by Date: Re: Lord of the code! [was: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]]
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Possible race condition in usb-serial.c
- Previous by thread: Re: [-mm patch] ptrace: Fix EFL_OFFSET value according to i386 pda changes (was Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb)
- Next by thread: Re: [-mm patch] ptrace: Fix EFL_OFFSET value according to i386 pda changes (was Re: BUG on 2.6.20-rc1 when using gdb)
- Index(es):