On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:20:39 EST, john stultz said: > I didn't hear any objections (or really, any comments) on my > last release, so as I mentioned then, I want to go ahead and push this > to Andrew for a bit of testing in -mm. Hopefully targeting for > inclusion in 2.6.21 or 2.6.22. Am running it on a Dell Latitude D820 (Core2 T7200 cpu). I had to un-do 4 conflicting patches in -rc1-mm1 and then it applied and ran clean, I still need to look at re-merging them: hpet-avoid-warning-message-livelock.patch clockevents-i386-hpet-driver.patch get-rid-of-arch_have_xtime_lock.patch x86_64-mm-amd-tsc-sync.patch It *looks* like all the pieces are there except a few lines of Kconfig magic to wire up the dynticks/NO_HZ stuff - or did I miss something crucial?
Attachment:
pgpXsXSf2g5yK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64
- References:
- [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64
- From: john stultz <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64
- Prev by Date: RE: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Next by Date: Re: Possible race condition in usb-serial.c
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/5][time][x86_64] Re-enable vsyscall support for x86_64
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5][time][x86_64] GENERIC_TIME patchset for x86_64
- Index(es):
 |