On 20/12/06, Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 12:39 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> Having the assignment of "ret = 1;" inside the loop seems a little
> pointless. Perhaps gcc can optimize it, but still, that assignment
> really only needs to happen once outside the loop.
Sure, but I was hoping gcc was smart enough. Placing it outside the loop
would require an extra if stmt. Also the chance this loop will actually
be traversed more than once is _very_ small.
allright - I just spotted it and thought I'd point it out :-)
--
Jesper Juhl <[email protected]>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
