On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:26:00 -0800 (PST)
Luben Tuikov <[email protected]> wrote:
> The reason was that my dev tree was tainted by this bug:
>
> if (good_bytes &&
> - scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, !!result) == NULL)
> + scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, result == 0) == NULL)
> return;
>
> in scsi_io_completion(). I had there !!result which is wrong, and when
> I diffed against master, it produced a bad patch.
Oh. I thought that got sorted out. It's a shame this wasn't made clear to
me..
> As James mentioned one of the chunks is good and can go in.
Please send a new patch, not referential to any previous patch or email,
including full changelogging.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
