Re: [BUG+PATCH] RT-Preempt: IRQ threads running at prio 0 SCHED_OTHER

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> ok - lets try it. Clark: does this impact the set_kthread_prio utility? 
> I've changed "IRQ 123" to "IRQ-123" to make pidof & friends work better.

Yes it does, but I believe I can fix that. Most of the logic is in awk
and I believe one call to sub() will handle the change.

Clark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFiFutHyuj/+TTEp0RAjKlAKCaVK8hf4jY6ZUIZ0Ixc56lhSUcHgCgoqT0
HiDbdVXrwY/LYlZN7AFwHOI=
=1YgX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [BUG+PATCH] RT-Preempt: IRQ threads running at prio 0 SCHED_OTHER
    • From: "Remy Bohmer" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [BUG+PATCH] RT-Preempt: IRQ threads running at prio 0 SCHED_OTHER
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Changes to sysfs PM layer break userspace
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.19: OOPS in cat /proc/fs/nfs/exports
• Previous by thread: Re: [BUG+PATCH] RT-Preempt: IRQ threads running at prio 0 SCHED_OTHER
• Next by thread: [patch] high-res timers: core, do itimer rearming in process context, fix
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]