On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:43:08PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Six hours here of fsx-linux plus high memory pressure on SMP on 1k
> blocksize ext3, mainline. Zero failures. It's unlikely that this testing
> would pass, yet people running normal workloads are able to easily trigger
> failures. I suspect we're looking in the wrong place.
I do not have a clue about memory management at all, but is it
possible that you're testing on a box with too much memory? My box has
only 256 MB, and I used to use mutt with a _huge_ inbox with mutt
taking somewhat 150 MB. Add spamassassin and a reasonably busy mail
server, and the box used to be like 150 MB in swap.
I have tidied my inbox in the mean time and mutt's memory requirement
has been reduced to somewhat 30 MB, which might be the cause that I
don't see the issue that often any more.
Greetings
Marc, just trying to give input
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
