On 12/18/06, Andrei Popa <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 12:41 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > But at the same time, it's interesting that it still happens when we try
> > to re-add the dirty bit. That would tell me that it's one of two cases:
>
> Forget that. There's a third case, which is much more likely:
>
> - Andrew's patch had a ", 1" where it _should_ have had a ", 0".
>
> This should be fairly easy to test: just change every single ", 1" case in
> the patch to ", 0".
>
> The only case that _definitely_ would want ",1" is actually the case that
> already calls page_mkclean() directly: clear_page_dirty_for_io(). So no
> other ", 1" is valid, and that one that needed it already avoided even
> calling the "test_clear_page_dirty()" function, because it did it all by
> hand.
>
> What happens for you in that case?
>
> Linus
I have file corruption.
No idea whether this can be a data point or not, but
here it goes... my P2P box is about to turn 5 days old
while running nonstop one or both of aMule 2.1.3 and
BitTorrent 4.4.0 on ext3 mounted w/default options
on both IDE and USB disks. Zero corruption.
AMD K7-800, 512MB RAM, PREEMPT/UP kernel,
2.6.19-git20 on top of up-to-date FC6.
--alessandro
"...when I get it, I _get_ it"
(Lara Eidemiller)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]