On Saturday 16 December 2006 10:07, Marek Wawrzyczny wrote:
> The open source driver development is promising but it has been mentioned
> several times that the project is undermanned and the vendors are not
> forthcoming with the necessary information.
> My hardware as it stands today is still not working with the open-source
> drivers. Perhaps this is the case of PEBCAK and not the open-source drivers
> per se but with a 1-4 hour turnaround to test a new version of the r300
> driver it is not a small effort on my part. Still, I'm eagerly awaiting the
> day that I'll be able to use an open-source driver that is on par with the
> ati one.
I buy the hardware. I actually want to get enough information about it
so that I can write a driver for it for my homegrown OS.
In the "old days" hardware was accompanied with such info.
For example, printers had control ESC sequences listed, etc.
These days, printers come with elaborate idiot-proof manuals
"how to properly connect your printer to the AC outlet"
and "how to properly insert Windows driver CD".
Ever met those Windows-only "GDI" printers which do not speak
any known open standard (they eat proprietary bitmap input instead)?
Why vendor has a right to restrict me to a few existing OSes?
I think that something is wrong here. Are there countries where
such practuce (of not providing tech info for writing drivers)
is illegal?
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
