Re: [PATCH 1/2] kill_something_info: misc cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> writes:

> On top of
> 	signal-rewrite-kill_something_info-so-it-uses-newer-helpers.patch
>
> - Factor out sending PIDTYPE_PGID wide signals.
>
> - Use is_init(p) instead of "p->pid > 1". We don't hash idle threads anymore,
>   no need to worry about p->pid == 0.


I do not believe is_init is the proper function here.  In the presence
of multiple pid namespaces the intention is for is_init to catch all of
the special handling (except signal behavior) for the init process.

That way when we have multiple processes with pid == 1 we know which
one we care about.


> - Use "p != current->group_leader" instead of "p->tgid != current->tgid",
>   saves one dereference and kills yet another direct pid_t usage.

Makes sense as you have to be a group_leader to be on the task list.

> - Simplify return value calculation for "pid == -1" case, remove "retval"
>   variable.
>
> No functional changes.

Looks sane.

> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux