Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]

On Friday, 15 December 2006 22:49, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The other box is mine and it works just fine with 2.6.20-rc1.
> > 
> >> I think something bad happened in sata land just recently.
> > 
> > Yup.  Please see, for example:
> > 
> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=116621656432500&w=2
> > 
> > It looks like the breakage is in sata, in the patches that went in after
> > 2.6.19-rc6-mm2 (that one worked for me like charm).
> 
> 
> So.... 2.6.20-rc1 works for you?

Yes.

Greetings,
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]
    • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
  • Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]
    • From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Binary Drivers
• Next by Date: Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]
• Previous by thread: Re: sata badness in 2.6.20-rc1? [Was: Re: md patches in -mm]
• Next by thread: [PATCH -- RFC] Add support OProfile for profiling Cell BE SPUs
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]