Re: realtime-preempt and arm

On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>
> so these results look pretty normal to me.

Ingo, Did you run this with high res turned off?  That will simulate his
scenerio more so.

> Modified code attached below.
> (Change the '#if 1' to '#if 0' to get the select() measurement.)

Your code is almost exactly what I did to test! :)

-- Steve

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: realtime-preempt and arm
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: realtime-preempt and arm
    • From: tike64 <[email protected]>
  • Re: realtime-preempt and arm
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19, more unwinder problems ...
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ensure unique i_ino in filesystems without permanent inode numbers (introduction)
• Previous by thread: Re: realtime-preempt and arm
• Next by thread: Re: realtime-preempt and arm
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]