On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 05:38:27PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Yes, EXPORT_SYMBOL_INTERNAL would make a lot more sense. A quick grep shows that changing this now would require updating nearly 1900 instances, so patches to do this would be pretty large and disruptive (though we could support both during a transition and migrate them over time). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: [email protected] (Jonathan Corbet)
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Chris Wedgwood <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Prev by Date: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Next by Date: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Next by thread: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Index(es):
 |