Alan wrote:
Another thing we should do more is aggressively merge prototype open drivers for binary only hardware - lets get Nouveau's DRM bits into the kernel ASAP for example.
ACK++ We should definitely push Nouveau[1] as hard as we can. Jeff [1] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: [email protected] (Jonathan Corbet)
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Bill Nottingham <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Alan <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-git19] BUG due to bad argument to ieee80211softmac_assoc_work
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Clarify i386/Kconfig explanation of the HIGHMEM config options
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Next by thread: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Index(es):
 |