On Dec 14 2006 12:42, Alan wrote: >On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:31:16 +0100 >Hans-Jürgen Koch <[email protected]> wrote: >> You think it's easier for a manufacturer of industrial IO cards to >> debug a (large) kernel module? > >You think its any easier to debug because the code now runs in ring 3 but >accessing I/O space. A NULL fault won't oops the system, but of course the wrong inb/inw/inl() or outb* can fubar the machine. >> > uio also doesn't handle hotplug, pci and other "small" matters. >> >> uio is supposed to be a very thin layer. Hotplug and PCI are already >> handled by other subsystems. > >And if you have a PCI or a hotplug card ? How many industrial I/O cards >are still ISA btw ? Something called PC104 out there. -`J' --
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- References:
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: "Martin J. Bligh" <[email protected]>
- RE: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: "Hua Zhong" <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Alan <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Hans-Jürgen Koch <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- From: Alan <[email protected]>
- Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Prev by Date: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Next by Date: Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19
- Previous by thread: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Next by thread: Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
- Index(es):