Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing

* Siddha, Suresh B <[email protected]> wrote:

> > the other problem is load_balance(): there this_rq is locked and you 
> > call resched_cpu() unconditionally.
> 
> But here resched_cpu() was called after double_rq_unlock().

yeah, you are right - the schedule() one is/was the only problem.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
    • From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Bug: early_pfn_in_nid() called when not early
• Next by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/loopback.c: convert to module_init()
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Patch: dynticks: idle load balancing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]