Re: isochronous receives?

I wrote:
> /* can be used for tag = 0...3 and ORed together for multiple tags */
> #define RAW1394_IR_MATCH_TAG(tag)   (1<<((tag)&3))

PS: or  ((tag)>>2 ? 0 : 1<<(tag))  or just  (1<<(tag))

> #define RAW1394_IR_MATCH_ALL_TAGS   -1

-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-==- ==-- -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • RE: isochronous receives?
    • From: "Keith Curtis" <[email protected]>
  • Re: isochronous receives?
    • From: "Robert Crocombe" <[email protected]>
  • Re: isochronous receives?
    • From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/loopback.c: convert to module_init()
• Next by Date: Re: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?!
• Previous by thread: Re: isochronous receives?
• Next by thread: Re: isochronous receives?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]