On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:20:57PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> After a lot of debugging in spufs, I found that a crash that we encountered
> on Cell actually was caused by a change in the memory management.
>
> The patch that caused it is archived in http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/11/1/43,
> and this one has been discussed back and forth, but I fear that the current
> version may be broken for all setups that do memory hotplug with sparsemen
> and NUMA, at least on powerpc.
I believe you are correct. At least the memory hotplug code for powerpc
is currently broken (caused crash!).
> - both early_pfn_{in,to}_nid and early_node_map are in the __init
> section and may already have been freed at the time we are calling
> memmap_init_zone().
Well that is the root of the problem for powerpc. I believe that
__meminit attribute on memmap_init_zone() has no definition if
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is defined. This is so that it can be called
after boot. But, this also implies that memmap_init_zone() can not
call any routines in the __init section.
> The patch below is not a suggested fix that I want to get into mainline
> (checking slab_is_available is the wrong here), but it is a quick fix
> that you should apply if you want to run a recent (post-2.6.18) kernel
> on the IBM QS20 blade. I'm sorry for not having reported this earlier,
> but we were always trying to find the problem in my own code...
Thanks for the debug work! Just curious if you really need
CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES defined for your platform? Can you get
those types of memory layouts? If not, an easy/immediate fix for you
might be to simply turn off the option.
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1962,7 +1962,8 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned
> for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
> if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn))
> continue;
> - if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid))
> + if (!slab_is_available() &&
> + !early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid))
> continue;
> page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> set_page_links(page, zone, nid, pfn);
I know you don't recommend this as a fix, but it has the interesting
quality of doing exactly what we want for powerpc. When
slab_is_available() we are performing a 'memory add' operation
and there is no need to do the 'pfn_in_nid' check. We know that
the range of added pages will all be on the same (passed) nid.
--
Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]