On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:20:59PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > Did anyone made any test under Windows? I cannot set there > iommu=soft, can I? Windows never uses the hardware iommu, so it's always doing the equivalent on iommu=soft - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?!
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <[email protected]>
- Re: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?!
- References:
- Re: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?!
- From: Karsten Weiss <[email protected]>
- Re: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?!
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <[email protected]>
- Re: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?!
- Prev by Date: Re: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?!
- Next by Date: Re: Question: removal of syscall macros?
- Previous by thread: Re: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?!
- Next by thread: Re: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives // memory hole mapping related bug?!
- Index(es):
 |