> But it's rather a lot of churn for such a thing. Did you consider simply using
> put_unaligned() against the specific offending field(s)?
Hi. This was not considered.
I wanted to give you some quick feedback, so I tried your suggestion in the
fork path. It seemed to fix the problem as well.
put_unaligned(timespec_to_ns(&ts), (__u64 *) &ev->timestamp_ns);
Is what I tried.
I'm on vacation tomorrow but on Thursday, if you like, I can whip up
a patch that does this and test it more thoroughly. Is this the
direction you prefer? What I did just now was really quick and dirty
to see if it has a shot or not but it looks like put_unaligned will
fix it too.
--
Erik Jacobson - Linux System Software - SGI - Eagan, Minnesota
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
