On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:49:13 -0800
David Brownell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fix a glitch in the procfs dumping of whether the alarm IRQ is enabled:
> use the traditional name (from drivers/char/rtc.c and many other places)
> of "alarm_IRQ", not "alrm_wakeup" (which didn't even match the efirtc
> code, which originated that reporting API).
>
> Also, update a few of the RTC drivers to stop providing that duplicate
> status, and/or to expose it properly when reporting the alarm state.
> We really don't want every RTC driver doing their own thing here...
>
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <[email protected]>
--
Best regards,
Alessandro Zummo,
Tower Technologies - Turin, Italy
http://www.towertech.it
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
