Re: [PATCH/RFC] Delete JFFS (version 1)

Jeff Garzik ([email protected]) said: 
> It's always been the case that we remove Linux kernel code when the 
> number of users (and more importantly, developers) drops to near-nil.

So, drivers/net/3c501.c?

Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Delete JFFS (version 1)
  - From: Alan <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Delete JFFS (version 1)
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH/RFC] Delete JFFS (version 1)
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Delete JFFS (version 1)
  - From: "Josh Boyer" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH/RFC] Delete JFFS (version 1)
  - From: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 9/12] repost: cciss: add busy_configuring flag
Next by Date: Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.19 + highmem = BUG at do_wp_page
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Delete JFFS (version 1)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Delete JFFS (version 1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]