On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:20:52 +0300
Dmitriy Monakhov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > XFS (at least) can call generic_file_direct_write() with i_mutex not held.
> > And vmtruncate() expects i_mutex to be held.
> >
> > I guess a suitable solution would be to push this problem back up to the
> > callers: let them decide whether to run vmtruncate() and if so, to ensure
> > that i_mutex is held.
> >
> > The existence of generic_file_aio_write_nolock() makes that rather messy
> > though.
> This means we may call generic_file_aio_write_nolock() without i_mutex, right?
> but call trace is :
> generic_file_aio_write_nolock()
> ->generic_file_buffered_write() /* i_mutex not held here */
> but according to filemaps locking rules: mm/filemap.c:77
> ..
> * ->i_mutex (generic_file_buffered_write)
> * ->mmap_sem (fault_in_pages_readable->do_page_fault)
> ..
> I'm confused a litle bit, where is the truth?
xfs_write() calls generic_file_direct_write() without taking i_mutex for
O_DIRECT writes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
