> > > (or in other words, why is SLES the only one with the problem?) > > Everyone has this "problem". Or how do you know what kernelrelease is > inside a random ELF or bzImage binary? I doubt anyone else will let it come to the "random" stage -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- From: Olaf Hering <[email protected]>
- 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add the ability to layer another driver over the serial driver
- Next by Date: [PATCH] constify pipe_buf_operations
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.19-git13: uts banner changes break SLES9 (at least)
- Index(es):
 |