Re: RFC: PCI quirks update for 2.6.16

[Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@sergiomb.no-ip.org>]

On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 13:41 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 01:42:48AM +0000, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-12-10 at 17:00 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_ENABLE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_VIA, PCI_ANY_ID,
> > > quirk_via_irq);
> > 
> > This is back to state of kernel 2.6.16 final (without .x)
> > 
> > In kernel 2.6.17 final we got
> > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/4/19/16)
> > commit 75cf7456dd87335f574dcd53c4ae616a2ad71a11 
> > Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
> > Date:   Tue Apr 18 23:57:09 2006 -0700 
> >     Signed-off-by: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
> >     Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
> >     Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> > and 
> > commit a7b862f663d81858531dfccc0537bc9d8a2a4121
> > Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
> > Date:   Mon May 15 09:43:55 2006 -0700
> >     [PATCH] VIA quirk fixup, additional PCI IDs    
> > 
> > BUT the latest stable and tested patch is the commit 09d6029f43ebbe7307854abdae204c25d711ff94
> > PCI: VIA IRQ quirk behaviour change, which in my opinion that should go in.
> 
> Commit 09d6029f43ebbe7307854abdae204c25d711ff94 is what Alan wasn't 
> happy with, and -mm contains Alan's solution...

No, Alan's solution was a post solution , which still on -mm, I think .

Thanks,
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Sérgio M.B.
> 
> cu
> Adrian
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/