On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 09:21:30 +0000
Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 01:13:27AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:55:57 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I think the bug really is the running of populate_rootfs() before running
> > > the initcalls, in init/main.c:init(). It's just more sensible to start
> > > running userspace after the initcalls have been run. Statically-linked
> > > drivers which want to load firmware files will lose. To fix that we'd need
> > > a new callback. It could be with a new linker section or perhaps simply a
> > > notifier chain.
> >
> > hm, actually... Add two new initcall levels, one for populate_rootfs() and
> > one for things which want to come after it (ie: drivers which want to
> > access the filesytem):
>
> IMO we should just call pipe (and socket) initialization directly at
> the same level as slab, task, dcache, etc.
spose that would work. But what other initcall-initialised things are not
yet available when populate_rootfs() runs?
<does grep _initcall */*.c>
<wonders why anything works at all>
> This is basic stuff needed to get operational kernel. We could try
> to put that on an additional initcall level, but then we ought to
> take the rest of basic setup there as well.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]