Re: [Patch](memory hotplug) Fix compile error for i386 with NUMA config

On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Yasunori Goto wrote:

> No.
> Other arch's arch_add_memory() and remove_memory() have been already
> used for NUMA case too. But i386 didn't do it because just 
> contig_page_data is used. 
> Current NODE_DATA() macro is defined both case appropriately.
> So, this #ifdef is redundant now.
> 

Then I assume the comment directly above this change is also redundant 
since it explicitly states that the following code is for the non-NUMA 
case.

		David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Patch](memory hotplug) Fix compile error for i386 with NUMA config
    • From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [Patch](memory hotplug) Fix compile error for i386 with NUMA config
    • From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch](memory hotplug) Fix compile error for i386 with NUMA config
    • From: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
  • Re: [Patch](memory hotplug) Fix compile error for i386 with NUMA config
    • From: Yasunori Goto <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] net: dev_watchdog() locking fix
• Next by Date: Re: [patch] net: dev_watchdog() locking fix
• Previous by thread: Re: [Patch](memory hotplug) Fix compile error for i386 with NUMA config
• Next by thread: Re: [Patch](memory hotplug) Fix compile error for i386 with NUMA config
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]