> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP > +#if (((BITS_PER_LONG/4) * PAGES_PER_SECTION) % PAGE_SIZE) != 0 > +#error "PAGE_SIZE/SECTION_SIZE relationship is not suitable for vmem_map" > +#endif Why the BITS_PER_LONG/4? Or to put in other words: why not simply PAGES_PER_SECTION % PAGE_SIZE != 0 ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] virtual memmap on sparsemem v3 [2/4] generic virtual mem_map on sparsemem
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] [PATCH] virtual memmap on sparsemem v3 [2/4] generic virtual mem_map on sparsemem
- References:
- [RFC] [PATCH] virtual memmap on sparsemem v3 [0/4] introduction
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- [RFC] [PATCH] virtual memmap on sparsemem v3 [2/4] generic virtual mem_map on sparsemem
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- [RFC] [PATCH] virtual memmap on sparsemem v3 [0/4] introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: pata_via in 2.6.19-rc6: UDMA/66 hdd downgraded to UDMA/33
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ensure unique i_ino in filesystems without permanent inode numbers (new functions)
- Previous by thread: [RFC] [PATCH] virtual memmap on sparsemem v3 [2/4] generic virtual mem_map on sparsemem
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] virtual memmap on sparsemem v3 [2/4] generic virtual mem_map on sparsemem
- Index(es):