On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 00:34:24 -0800
Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
>
> oprofile uses smp_num_siblings without testing for CONFIG_X86_HT.
> I looked at modifying oprofile, but this way is cleaner & simpler
> and I didn't see a good reason not to just export it when CONFIG_SMP.
>
> WARNING: "smp_num_siblings" [arch/i386/oprofile/oprofile.ko] undefined!
>
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6.19-git13.orig/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ linux-2.6.19-git13/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int __devinitdata smp_b_stepping;
>
> /* Number of siblings per CPU package */
> int smp_num_siblings = 1;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_num_siblings);
> #endif
smpboot.c isn't compiled if CONFIG_SMP=n, so I'll just remove the ifdef,
thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
