Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: two bugfixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: two bugfixes
From: Seth Arnold <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 16:43:46 -0800
Cc: lkml <[email protected]>, [email protected], Andrew Morton <[email protected]>, Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Mail-followup-to: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>, lkml <[email protected]>, [email protected], Andrew Morton <[email protected]>, Stephen Smalley <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 01:36:57PM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> The other is that root can lose capabilities by executing files with
> only some capabilities set.  The next two patches change these
> behaviors.

I saw this in my code review and thought that this behaviour was
intentional. :) It seemed like a good idea to me..

Attachment: pgpVkfB8STqdy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: two bugfixes
  - From: Crispin Cowan <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: two bugfixes
  - From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [stable] [patch 00/32] -stable review
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/1 v3] Char: isicom, fix card locking
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: two bugfixes
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] file capabilities: two bugfixes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux