Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> binutils-2.17.50.0.8-1.i686
>> gcc-4.2.0-0.20061206r119598.2.i686
>>     
>
> Hmm, that's not even a release -- afaik gcc 4.2 isn't out yet.
>
> Can you please do
>
> make arch/i386/math-emu/fpu_entry.i
> make arch/i386/math-emu/fpu_entry.s
>
> and send me the resulting .i and .s files privately? 
>   

Me too please.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- What was in the x86 merge for .20
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20
  - From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[email protected]>
- Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] WorkStruct: Implement generic UP cmpxchg() where an arch doesn't support it
Next by Date: Re: PPC compiler error (redefinition of 'struct bug_entry')
Previous by thread: Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20
Next by thread: Re: What was in the x86 merge for .20
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]